- “Our killer question is ‘How do you propose to defeat Islamism?’ Those who make all Islam their enemy not only succumb to a simplistic and essentialist illusion but they lack any mechanism to defeat it.”
This is what historian and Middle East analyst Daniel PipesÂ asksÂ in his recentÂ Washington TimesÂ article.
To support his argument, Pipes makes an unsubstantiatedclaimÂ that a majority of Muslims are moderate and that Islamism is only,
supported byÂ 10-15 percentÂ of Muslims…
So how and why did he come up with such numbers? Pipes uses different studies and surveys about which he himselfconfesses: “TheseÂ ambiguousÂ andÂ contradictoryÂ percentages lead to no clear, specific count of Islamists.” Why then use such statistics? It is only to serve the major argument he made in my first paragraph.
And there are more “confessions.” Pipes writes: “Out of aquantitative mish-mash, I suggested justÂ three days after 9/11Â that some 10-15 percent of Muslims are determined Islamists.” This is in itself contradictory and is even absolutely nonsense mathematically as he clearly admits. To further support this conservative number, Pipes adds:
- Indonesian survey and election results led
R. William Liddle and Saiful MujaniÂ in 2003 to conclude that the number of Islamists “is no more thanÂ 15 percentÂ of the total Indonesian Muslim population.”
He did this while he ignored his other statement:
In contrast, a 2008 survey of 8,000 Indonesian Muslims byÂ Roy Morgan ResearchÂ foundÂ 40 percentÂ of Indonesians favoringÂ haddÂ criminal punishments (such as cutting off the hands of thieves) andÂ 52 percentfavoring some form of Islamic legal code.
So here we have 52% of Indonesians are extremists, not 15%.
Yet even that doesn’t determine the correct percentages to separate Muslims from Islamists. To say that “views on 9/11? or “supportingÂ Hadd” (Islamic punishment) is the yardstick to measure the percentages is also absurd and mathematically false. What if a Muslim doesn’t support 9/11 orÂ HaddÂ but supports the idea that it takes two women in a court of law to equal the testimony of a man? Will Pipes count him as a moderate Muslim or an extremist Islamist? If he chooses “moderate,” then Pakistan got it right. No matter what Pipes chooses, it debunks all his unsubstantiated claims about moderate Islam.
What if a Muslim couldn’t care less about Sharia, jihad, and 9/11, yet he kills his sister for marrying a Jew? Is he a “Muslim” or is he an “Islamist”?
And what if we even use terrorism as a yardstick as Pipes prefers; in Saudi Arabia and across the Muslim world, you have many who do not support al-Qaeda. Are these then counted as moderates? In Pipes’ view the answer is “yes.” But this is false. Last week I had an exchange with Sheikh Faisal Al-Harbi, who chastised me on such issues,stating that his clan (Al-Harbi) would not support terrorism. Indeed, on his clan’sÂ official websiteÂ they denounce al-Qaeda, adding:
Jihad for the sake of Allah is to go to war with the infidels and the polytheists to remove these and enforce Unitarianism. That isÂ after inviting them to IslamÂ and theyÂ reject the invitationÂ (Da’wa). This Jihad is …read more