Petraeus had originally been scheduled to testify this Thursday on theÂ burgeoning controversy over the deadly Sept. 11 attack. That appearance wasÂ scuttled, though, after the director abruptly resigned over an extramaritalÂ affair.
The resignation has since expanded into a sprawling scandal that now includesÂ allegations that Gen. John Allen, the top U.S. commander in Afghanistan,Â exchanged “inappropriate” and sexually charged emails with Jill Kelley, aÂ Florida socialite linked to the Petraeus case. The rapid developments in theÂ case have all but obscured what until last week was an intense debate on CapitolÂ Hill and beyond over the Benghazi terror attack.
After Petraeus’ resignation, lawmakers complained that the scandal was noÂ reason they shouldn’t hear from the man at the helm of the CIA when CIAÂ operatives came under attack alongside State Department employees in BenghaziÂ last month.
The logistics of Petraeus’ appearance are still being worked out. But aÂ source close to Petraeus said the former four-star general has contacted theÂ CIA, as well as committees in both the House and Senate, to offer his testimonyÂ as the former CIA director.
Fox News has learned he is expected to speak off-site to the SenateÂ Intelligence Committee on Friday about his Libya report. The House side isÂ still being worked out.
Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans were killed in the Sept.Â 11 attack, which the administration initially blamed on a “spontaneous” mobÂ reacting to protests over an anti-Islam film. Officials later labeled the attackÂ terrorism.
While Petraeus prepares to give his side, lawmakers have begun to openlyÂ question when Petraeus first knew about the investigation that uncovered hisÂ affair — and whether it impacted his statements to Congress on Sept. 14 aboutÂ the Libya terror attack.
Petraeus briefed lawmakers that day that the attack was akin to a flash mob,Â and some top lawmakers noted to Fox News he seemed “wedded” to theÂ administration’s narrative that it was a demonstration spun out of control. TheÂ briefing appeared to conflict with one from the FBI and NationalÂ Counterterrorism Center a day earlier in which officials said the intelligenceÂ supported an Al Qaeda or Al Qaeda-affiliated attack.
Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., told Fox News he now questions whether Petraeus’Â statements — which were in conflict with both the FBI briefing and availableÂ raw intelligence — were in any way impacted by the knowledge the FBI wasÂ investigating his affair with Broadwell.
King questioned whether the investigation “consciously or subconsciously”Â affected his statements to Congress.
Source: Fox News