For many people in the Arab world, “democracy” is good and people should vote only because voting can bring the undemocratic Muslim Brotherhood to power. But if voting does not bring the desired outcome – a Muslim state wedded to Sharia law – then back to the revolution and the caliphate.
Following another night of violence in Cairo during which 72 people were killed,The New York TimesÂ accused the military led government of Abdul Fattah al Sisi of “radicalizing” the Muslim Brotherhood. “For all its stated commitment to democracy and nonviolence, the Brotherhood’s only reliable partners now are other Islamist groups whose members may be more willing to use violent or radical tactics – partners that would tar the Brotherhood’s identity as a more pragmatic movement with a broader base.”
The poor Brotherhood. It seems, according toÂ The Times,Â that people it cannot control are pushing it into violence it does not want. Pardon me, but how do you “radicalize” an organization the credo of which is, “Allah is our objective; the Quran is our law, the Prophet is our leader; Jihad is our way; and death for the sake of Allah is the highest of our aspirations”? The Brotherhood was born in violence and knows the value not only of violence, but also of martyrdom. Since its ouster, its leaders have been threatening and inciting violence, hoping to provoke the secular government into killing.
The organization works much the same way Hamas – the Brotherhood’s Palestinian franchise – does. Hamas implants its military capabilities, storehouses and launch sites in civilian neighborhoods in Gaza. From behind the captive civilians, it fires rockets and missiles at Israeli towns, putting on high alert a million people on who will have exactly 15 seconds to find shelter when the alarm goes off. When the situation becomes intolerable, Israel responds and Hamas wins: if the Israelis are cautious, and there are no civilian casualties, Hamas has terrorized Israel with no consequence. If there are civilian casualties, Hamas wins again, bewailing Israeli brutality in front of Western media.
The wailing and moaning of Cairenes over the Brotherhood dead is similarly suspect. The temporary, albeit decades-long non-violence of the Egyptian Brotherhood was the product of decades of imprisonment and persecution at the hands of secular Egyptian governments, and the knowledge that it would not come to power in Egypt by the sword. But whatÂ The TimesÂ calls the Brotherhood’s “stated commitment to democracy and nonviolence,” was belied by its violent and non-democratic year in power, and by its behavior since its ouster.
Coptic Christians have born the brunt of the Brotherhood’s disregard for minorities in general and Christians in particular. The Morsi government denied culpability in an attack onÂ April 4, in which four men were killed and homes, a nursery and a church were burned. But video from anÂ April 7Â attack on St. Mark’s ChurchÂ , in which two Copts were killed and 84 wounded, show Egyptian security forces ignoring the perpetrators. When it was over, …read more