Woodmere Club

By 5TJT Staff

It’s hard to embrace change. For over 100 years, Five Towns residents enjoyed the bucolic view of acres of grassy turf on which to play golf, host events, and enjoy pleasant walks or runs along Woodmere’s golf course. Most residents were blissfully unaware that the Woodmere Club was losing money and that the property had never changed from residential zoning.

The owners sold the property to real-estate developers Robert Weiss and Efrem Gerszberg, eliciting outcries and fears of overdevelopment. Weiss and Gerszberg have decades of experience building beautiful properties that fit in with their environments, and their Willow View Estates plan calls for 284 single-family lots. There was an alternate plan for a senior living condo development and 20 acres of open space which was previously reported in this paper. However, it fell on the deaf ears of the politicians, even though there were over 150 reservations for those types of units.

Neighbors of the property, in particular, besieged their elected officials with demands to ban development. The Town of Hempstead held a meeting filled with boos and sneers at a Cameron Engineering proposal for fewer houses and more grassland. Elected officials recognized that compromise was not possible and continued to issue illegal moratoriums to stall the process. Then a survey was sent to the residents by the Town of Hempstead asking if they would agree to a tax increase to purchase the land as a park. The overwhelming majority responded in the negative.

The developer, in coordination with Town of Hempstead, Village of Lawrence, and Village of Woodsburgh, proceeded with the review of the proposed 284-lot subdivision plan before the Nassau County Planning Commission (“NCPC”), which included a review under New York State’s Environmental Quality Review Act (“SEQRA”). They had completed a substantial part of the SEQRA review process, having spent almost two years and nearly $2 million on fees, plans, and studies, including the completion of a full draft environmental impact statement (“DEIS”) that analyzed the environmental consequences of every component of the project pursuant to the mandates of SEQRA. The NCPC deemed the DEIS complete on May 14, 2020, and, at that time, published the DEIS for review by the municipalities as involved agencies and for comment by the public.

Instead of participating in the review process, the Town of Hempstead, Village of Lawrence, and Village of Woodsburgh voted in late June and early July 2020 to designate a new “Coastal Conservation District – Woodmere Club” zone. The zone was formulated for the municipalities by the same engineering firm that created a Proposed 2018 Golf Course Zone, which would have permitted 125 single-family lots. The newly enacted “zoning” reduced the permitted density on the property from the previously permitted 284 single-family residential lots to just 59, a loss of approximately 80%, or 255 lots. It also takes away the developers’ ability to develop 80% of their acreage.

The developers see many constitutional violations and legal flaws in the Coastal Conservation District and brought a federal lawsuit requesting the Coastal Conservation District be declared null and void or that the municipalities involved pay the company approximately $200,000,000 for taking their land without compensation.

The consensus seems to be that we all want to avoid overdevelopment and the fearful flooding in its wake, traffic headaches, taxing of limited resources. But last year the Town of Hempstead allowed new zoning in Lawrence and Inwood for a major commercial and residential development. The Village of Lawrence is strongly considering building a senior living residence on the site of the former sewage treatment plant.

The Willow View developers had a proposal to provide a Regency-like development on more than four times the acreage of the Regency with a 20-acre park donated to the community. This Plan B offered the community open space and much-needed senior living. The Plan B complex would significantly reduce traffic due to the general reduced driving patterns of seniors and the absence of school buses.

Working together usually yields the best results. The Willow View developers are urging residents to not allow their elected leaders to rack up millions of dollars in useless legal fees to fight a potentially losing battle with tremendous exposure to damages (there are already three different law firms hired to defend the litigation). It would seem that a better course of action would be to negotiate a solution that provides a much-needed asset for our growing and aging community. Save the money, save the time, and let’s work together to make the Woodmere Club property a beautiful locale once again.

3 COMMENTS

  1. Did the developers write this??
    Beautiful homes? Is this a joke?
    This is an incredible piece of garbage! The out of state developers met with no one and they couldn’t care less that their horrendous plan will destroy this community. How could a paper that supposedly has the community interest offer this complete nonsense? Is it ad dollars if so just say so, or at least leave the issue alone but to write this “Editorial” is utterly bizarre and irresponsible. 280 homes = 1000 cars. Their second proposal that would be cheaper for them to build but offer just as many residences was supposedly better on the traffic issue based on Their claim that people over 50 don’t drive… Really?!
    Mr. Gordan do you still drive??
    How does this editor compare one Yeshiva Building on the 878 To 280 homes in the heart of Woodmere? How does he compare one apartment building on a wide open part of Central to 280 homes on Broadway??
    Please Mr Gordon, don’t try to pit our elected leaders who are trying to protect us against us even if the developers are paying you to do it!!!
    Brice Blakeman and Alex Edelman dwarves a lot of credit for fight this, you would do well to stand by your neighbors and join them rather than sell the community out.

  2. To DEEPLY CONCERNED CITIZEN OF 5T, I Don’t think anybody can say it any better than you did. The developers have zero interest in anything except making many multiples of profit on their investment. It’s amazing how many home developers would not consider this project when the property was for sale, and only these lovely gentleman did. Our residents, and elected officials will stay on course, and they will be able to make a great return on their investment;which they are entitled and deserve, and at the same time preserve an entire community’s investment for generations to come. Has anybody forgotten the term dignity.Thank you

  3. What is this a paid advertisement by the developer? We all wondered how they got the deal so cheap,, clearly it included an advertising budget!!

    Totally out of touch w reality on ground and not the first time regarding your lopsided reporting on the matter.

    Big thank you to our politicians for doing what is right for our future!!

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here